Ex-works & FOB quotes · 48 h response · Mill test certificate with every shipment
Sales: +86 178 6299 6767

Technical guide

RHS vs SHS: rectangular or square?

Same steel, different shape. A rectangular hollow section puts more material where the bending moment is, but only if the load comes from one predictable direction.

The efficiency argument

For the same weight per metre, an RHS with a 2:1 depth-to-width ratio has roughly 1.6–1.9× the bending stiffness about its strong axis compared with an SHS of the same weight. That is why beams are deep and narrow.

MemberBest shapeWhy
Simply supported beamRHS (deep, narrow)Material far from the neutral axis
ColumnSHSEqual stiffness both ways, no weak axis
Truss chordRHSBending in the vertical plane only
Gate or guard frameSHSLoads from any direction, torsion common
Headroom-limited lintelRHS laid flat or deepDepth is free, height is not

Where square wins on site

Practical limits

RHS wider than about 200 mm and thinner than 4 mm tends to distort during welding at the corners — flats that wide need either a thicker wall or a stiffener. Our practical range runs 20×40 to 300×500 mm with 1.5–16 mm wall; the full matrix is in the catalogue.

For galvanising, an RHS needs a drain hole at each end of the longest dimension and a vent at the opposite corner — a long flat section can trap air.

FAQ

Can I use RHS as a column?

Only if you brace the weak axis. An unbraced RHS column buckles about its narrow axis long before the strong one.

Is RHS more expensive than SHS?

Per tonne they are similar; per metre of finished beam the RHS is usually cheaper because you need less steel.

What is the standard RHS size range?

We roll 20×40 through 300×500 mm; the common structural sizes are 40×80, 50×100, 60×120 and 100×200.

Related sizes